Anthro assignment Essays

Anthro assignment Essays Anthro assignment Essay Anthro assignment Essay A second ethical issue that could arise from genetic testing would be that it might be hard to interpret the information about the child through facts and online readings. If a mother decides to abort her child due to a gene mutation she doesnt consider positive, she isnt giving this child a chance to possibly fight it and live longer than expected. Theres not a chance given if the mother takes it away. Lastly, another ethical issue regarding genetic testing would be that it could rut the mothers attitude towards her pregnancy. Some mothers may not be emotionally sound enough to handle the information if it may be bad and that can take a toll on the overall pregnancy. #3 One bias Diamond could have would be the fact that hes Jewish. ATA-Cash seems to be more prevalent in Jewish communities and seeing that Diamonds Jewish this could make the content of his article more geared towards how much it affects Jewish descendants. A second bias or baggage that the author could have is that Hess a male so that could make it a little reader for him to understand or comprehend how the woman might feel during this time. This impacted the article because I think that when he talks about abortions and the options after MIS more matter of fact than sentimental. I think if a woman had written this maybe her nurturing side would have been more prominent than Diamonds views. Lastly another bias see Diamond express in his article is that hes older. I think this impacts the article because he has a lot more facts and explanations that he has gained ever time so it helps him make his point and outline what he has to say. 4 One possible reason the ATA-Cash allele still remains prevalent in certain populations even though they no longer live in ghetto-like environments is because the gene could have been mutated to fit into another environment. Humans and mutations are forever evolving and adapting to this world so TFH gene for ATA-Cash could have changed.

death of a sales man essays

death of a sales man essays was a good on in that all the charters were not wearing masks. Well anywise Willy Loman was played by Dustin Hoffman and well he did a great job portraying his charter. And he did very well. The move well little slow to the start but after it introduced all the charts and the things starting falling in place then that is when everything came clear. But I really feel sorry for Willy but in the same persificted I am pissed off at him, but he is cheating in his wife and well in my mind I dont think that is a good idea. But his sons take most of the flak cus he makes them out to something they are not. See in my mind Willy is a dreamer and well he wishes that he and his family could always live the good live but in fact they cant. He lives in the burbs and well he is also in a dead end job, that will never take him or his family any where. His family consisted of his loving wife Linda, she was the back bone of the family she kept everything in live and going in the right direction for Willy and his sons. Then there was Happy, he was the player and tycoon and always looking for recognition from his father, but never really got it. Because there was Biff his pride and joy he thought the world revolved around him. Then there was Charlie Willy only true friend ever thought they would fight on a regular basic that still were friend and Charlie ever help Willy out with a little side cash just to keep things running at home. But still Willy is always in a dream state it is like he is taking drugs and seeing theses thins and imagining them. He should have tried to get some help but he was to staborn. In to I see so many of my own friend day dreaming cus well, dreaming is good ...

Managing organisational design and change Essay

Managing organisational design and change - Essay Example The report will include an immediate action list and a longer term plan for improvement of the organisation. This report will also attempt to suggest and establish the best way the organisation can effectively utilize the strategic changes that can be implemented to ensure better performance in the manufacturing of Office System 2010 (OS 2010). There is also need to identify the agendas of the stakeholders for the initiative to be successful. Attention in this case will be on the need to sustain organisational change which requires aspects like organisational learning whereby the workers can be re-orientated through provision of basic training and development which would be closely monitored upon implementation in order to improve their performance so as to guarantee quality of the products offered. 1.1 Description of the organisation’s current strategic quality and operational performance Technology Limited (Comm Tech) is an organisation which produces electronic office and b usiness equipment. Comm Tech is number three in the UK in terms of market share, number ten in Europe but still has to establish significant sales in the wider world market. The company has of late invested heavily over the years in the areas of research and development and in proto-type design which has seen designs of several successful products. The current business strategy for the company is primarily focused on developing a range of high quality products that would underpin penetration of the wider world markets and business growth. Concern is on growing business as quickly as possible in this particular case. Comm. Tech has sought to utilise the competitive advantage strategy but as going to be described in detail, it can be noted that this strategy is posing some serious challenges to its operational performance. Porter (1985) has suggested that many businesses are strategically viable such that their competitors may not be able to exceed their performance and he termed this state of affairs competitive advantage. Such stable status can be achieved only when they apply certain strategies that can hardly be imitated by the rival competitors. Porter (1985) has argued that a firm needs to have sustainable competitive advantages. Kotler and Armstrong (2004) concur with this notion when they suggest that competitive advantage is an advantage gained over other competitors by offering consumers greater value either by lowering prices or providing more benefits that justifies higher prices. There are mainly two sources of competitive advantage namely; cost advantage and differentiation as illustrated in the diagram below. Through Porter’s generic strategies, a ‘Cost Leadership’ strategy is where a firm seeks to be a low-cost producer in the industry whereas ‘Differentiation’ is when a firm seeks to be unique in the industry through offering products that are highly valued by the customers. Fig 1. Porter’s Generic strateg y model Competitive Advantage Source: In this particular

Amazon Organization Is Involved in Online Retail Trade Research Paper

Amazon Organization Is Involved in Online Retail Trade - Research Paper Example Amazon manufactures electronics, such as the Amazon Kindle, for clients and provides cloud-computing services. Additional revenue for the company is from marketing services. This is mainly by online advertisement and co-branding of credit cards (Schneider, 46). The company operates in the United States and in other countries such as France, Germany and China. Strategy Amazon usually delivers products to the customers after transactions are complete. This usually takes a couple of days depending on diverse logistical factors that include distance and address. However, the company has introduced a new system, popularly called same day shipping. This enables clients to buy products online and then the products are delivered to them the same day. This remains its clear-cut strategy to ensure the achievement of competitive advantage. Indeed, the large range of products that it sells is one of the noble strategies that the company is integrating. Buyers can find a variety of products such as toys, electronics, and books that are in excellent form. It customizes the experience of the buyers and gives recommendations for advancement in service delivery that contributes to customer retention. Additionally, it does customer tracking to enable it to gain more customers and retain them. It also gives individuals the opportunity to sell various commodities via its platform (Rosenbloom, 174). These can be either new goods or those that have been used. The advantage that Amazon has had over its competitors is that it does not charge sales taxes. This is mainly because its clients perform online purchasing that ensures effective ordering and delivery of the items with immense convenience. The company’s prior operating strategy was to avoid establishing networks in the nations that have adopted unfriendly tax policies, and thus such states do not have Amazon distribution warehouses. However, the new strategy that it is adopting requires that it sets warehouses across the United States including those tax unfriendly states. This means that the company will give up the lead it has over competitors. However, more warehouses in many states in the US will mean that products are closer to clients thus can be delivered the same day that purchase takes place. This can benefit individuals who are last minute gift shoppers. Local commercial institutions usually push these states to collect sales tax from Amazon because lack of such revenue gives the company a price advantage over them. However, online retailers such as Amazon are exempted from paying sales tax in states in which they do not have physical existence. Currently, Amazon has warehouses in six states and thus contributes sales tax in six states. These are Washington, Kentucky, New York, Texas, Kansas and North Dakota (Rosenbloom, 174). With the new strategy, it will have to collect sales levies in more states. Presently, it is unclear how the strategy will affect the revenues. Effects on competito rs, consumers and Revenues Amazon has eluded charging sales tax from its clients.

American Airline Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

American Airline - Essay Example At the same time, it maximizes on the profits whenever apparent (Oliver, 108). In addition, this strategy trims down the stiff competition from rival airlines and enhances quality services (Koontz, 439). To understand how the airline maximizes profits and selling amount needed to determine the optimal mix of fare for this flight, the super 80 jet with a carrying capacity of 125 to calculate was provided. Exhibit 1 shows past information of this flight’s cumulative graph and shows that the fare for this flight ranges from $170-$750 per seat. Chances are that 20-25 booking opportunities will be vacant for us to retain the customers, as all tickets are refundable. This gives us enough time to bid new prices for the flight before any booking announcement has taken place. Additionally there is a 15% and 20% no show flow of local passengers, and obviously, demand is greater for the lower charge than the higher charge; hence, no fiscal records for no-shows. Profits are an unconstructive action due to spoilage and over-sale penalties, yet it is an affirmative action due to the optimal mix fares. The percentage of cost incurred due to spoilage is $150 each, and the penalty for over-sa le is $100 per passenger for five passengers and below, $250 per passenger for six to ten passengers and $500 per passenger for eleven and more passengers. Fares are determined by the rule of supply and demand; that is, when the departure date is near, and the fare decreases when the flight is sparsely booked, and seats start to run out the fare increases. In regard to the super 80 jet, the capability of bidding the prices is used to compel acceptance or rejection of bookings, which is from $170-$750 per seat. For example, a customer asked for the pro-rated fare, which is greater or equal to your bid price, the entire passengers are accepted with the same fare, thus determining the proceeds. As stated earlier, profits are determined

A Study On The Khmer Rouge History Essay

A Study On The Khmer Rouge History Essay In Cambodia about 1.5 million people were killed in the mid 1970s. The Khmer Rouge were responsible for all the action that took place during that time. The Khmer Rouge believed in communism. They wanted everyone to be equal. The Khmer Rouge was led by Pol Pot and his brothers. The Khmer Rouge ruled Cambodia from 1975 to 1979. According to the Wikipedia article 1/5 of the countrys total population (estimates range from 850,000 to 2.5 million) under its regime, through execution, torture, starvation and forced labor (Wikipedia Khmer Rouge[1]). Also According to the same article, The leaders were mostly from middle class families and had been educated at French universities (Wikipedia Khmer Rouge[2]). The Khmer Rouges idea of communism was bad for the country of Cambodia. The Khmer Rouge relocated people, put all of the people in Cambodia to work as farmers in labor camp and changed the lifestyle of the country. The Khmer Rouge made the people work hard labor, killed a lot of people, and they brainwashed the country telling by them that communism was good for them. The Khmer Rouge took over Cambodia in 1975 and put all the people to work in hard labor and changed the way of life. Pol Pot led the Khmer Rouge. When they took over Cambodia they closed down everything and relocated people. For example in the Khmer Rouge article the author writes, New people driving them in all directions from the capital and other cities. It forcibly settled townspeople among the rural base peopleand put them in agricultural labor camps without wages, right, or free time (Khmer Rouge[3]). This shows that the Cambodians did not have any rights when the Khmer Rouge was ruling. This is important because the Khmer Rouge wanted everyone to work on farms and enslaved the people. The Khmer Rouge let many Cambodians die from starvations and the Khmer Rouge executed people. For example, in the article Khmer Rouge, it says, by the early 1979 approximately 650,000 people, or one quarter of the new Khmer died from execution, starvation overwork, disease, and denial of medical care (Khmer Rouge[4]). This shows that the Khmer Rouge had a lot of power and they could do anything to the people. This is important because the Khmer Rouge didnt care about the people. The Khmer Rouge wanted everyone to be poor and have no society. According to the Wikipedia article, The Khmer Rouge attempted to turn Cambodia into a classless society by depopulating cities and forcing the urban population into agricultural communes. The entire population was forced to become farmers in labor camp (Wikipedia Khmer Rouge[5]). This shows that everyone had to work in the farms and everyone have the same job. This is important because the Khmer Rouge wanted to have a low class society and everyone has to be the same as one another. Having a classless society was important to Pol Pot. He did not want people to become rich. He feared that people with money would be able to gain power. So, Pol Pot decided to abolish the currency system, which made it impossible to become rich. Furthermore, he took the land away from the people and did not allow anyone to own land. The people of Cambodia had nothing. While the people had nothing, the Khmer Rouge had power and they had full control of the country. They could force people to do things and they could change the lifestyle of Cambodia. The Khmer Rouge killed a lot of people. The Khmer Rouge killed those who were not pure Cambodian. For example in the Khmer Rouge article it says they killed ethic Vietnamese, ethnic Chinese, ethic Thai, Cambodian christens, Muslims, and Buddhist monks (Wikipedia Khmer Rouge[6]). This shows that the Khmer Rouge didnt want to have a mixed race Cambodians. This is important because the Khmer Rouge wanted one race pure Cambodians. This was similar to Hitler when he killed all the Jews. Pol Pot and his followers executed and tortured anyone who was not pure Cambodians. He shot them in the head, he cut off their arms, he tore their eyeballs out, and beheaded many non pure Cambodians. He did this because he believed that they were not worthy to be human beings. He devalued them and treated them worse than animals. Pol Pot and his followers were filled with hate and anger. The Khmer Rouge also killed educated people. For example, in the Khmer Rouge article it says they killed professional and intellectual in practice this included almost everyone with an education (Wikipedia Khmer Rouge[7]). This shows that the Khmer Rouge didnt want educated people around. This is important because they might form a group and tell everyone that communism is bad then everyone going to be against it. Pol Pot and his followers didnt want the people of Cambodia to be educated. They were afraid that if the people were educated, they would be harder to control. They didnt want the people of Cambodia to resist what they were doing. The Khmer Rouge believed that the best way to control the people is by keeping them uneducated and ignorant and to use force with anyone that showed resistance. The Khmer Rouge also killed people who were against communism and the Khmer Rouge didnt want capitalism in Cambodia. Pol Pot did not want a free market in his country. They wanted agriculture and farming as a way to bring the country of Cambodia to prominence. He did not want Cambodia to have any western influence. Because the previous government had affiliations with France, anyone with ties to the previous government were killed. For example in the same article it says they killed anyone with connections to the former government or with foreign governments (Wikipedia Khmer Rouge[8]). This shows that the Khmer Rouge didnt want to have any connection with other government. This is important because the Khmer Rouge want to have control of the country. Therefore while Khmer Rouge was in power they killed all non-pure Cambodians, forced people into agriculture, killed people with an education, took away land and they didnt want anyone the have connection with the government. The Khmer Rouge believed in communism. According to the definition in Wikipedia, communism is a socioeconomic structure and political ideology that promotes the establishment of an egalitarian, classless, stateless society based on common ownership and control of the means of production and property in general (Wikipedia Communism[9]). This is important because the people of Cambodia believed that the Khmer Rouge would bring a classless society to the country. Furthermore, the people of Cambodia believed that every citizen in Cambodia would participate in the decisions making process in both political in economic spheres of life. However, the Khmer rouge had a different agenda. The Khmer Rouge was able to get the support of the Cambodian people based on the vision of a classless society that allows every Cambodian citizen to participate in the decisions making process both politically and economically. However, when the Khmer Rouge got into power, their actions were far from what the y promised for the people of Cambodia. They brainwashed the people and told them that communism is good for the country. Communism is people who want everyone in the country to be the same and equal. They want everyone to have the same job and same everything. The Khmer Rouge told the people everyone gets paid the same or they might not get paid at all, everyone have access to heath care, public assistance and everyone goes to the same school. The Khmer Rouge made it sound good for the people and the Cambodians thought they were going to have those things and all the benefit. But the Khmer Rouge didnt deliver the promise they made to the people. The Khmer Rouge separated families killed people, put them to work hard on the farms, and tortured people. Some people argued that it was beneficial to have the Khmer Rouge in control of the government and country of Cambodia. The Khmer Rouges leadership provided independence from France and loosened the control from other countries. The people of Cambodia believed that if they were independent from other countries they would have peace in their country and they will not have war. Furthermore, the supporters of the Khmer Rouge believe they could be a prosperous and financially independent country. Therefore, According to An Independent Cambodia article, They broke diplomatic and trade ties with virtually all countries and launched a program to achieve self sufficiency through rice production as the great kingdoms of Angkor had done(An independent Cambodia[10]). This is important because the Khmer Rouge wanted to bring independence and freedom to Cambodia. Therefore the Khmer Rouge wanted Cambodia to be independent from the other countries and they wanted the people of Cambodia to live fr ee healthy and prosperous lives. However, the Khmer Rouge brought pain and stress for the people of Cambodia. There were no benefits for having the Khmer Rouge in the country. They killed people, took away any rights, and they put the people to work as slaves. Although Cambodia had independence from other countries, the people of Cambodia continued to suffer. The people were forced to work on rice field up to 18 hours per day. The workers were rarely fed and were not paid any wages. Furthermore, many people were executed, tortured, and force to separate from love ones. The Khmer Rouge brought destruction, pain, and did not provide the freedom and prosperity it promised its citizens. The Khmer Rouges leadership and idea of Communism was bad for the country of Cambodia. It brought nothing but bad things to the country. The Khmer Rouge put people to work hard labor. Many people worked in the rice field. They worked like slaves and they didnt get paid. Furthermore, they didnt have any freedom; they did not have a choice. They were forced to work on rice fields against their will. If they didnt comply, they were executed, tortured, or beaten badly. The Khmer Rouge relocated people and separated families and forced them to work at different places. The Khmer Rouge killed a lot of people. The Khmer Rouge wanted all the Cambodian to be pure meaning that they didnt want to have mixed racist they only wanted everyone to be one race and they killed educated people. The Khmer Rouge brainwashed people saying that communism is good for the countries but that really didnt happen. Instead the Khmer Rouge put the Cambodians in labor camps and killing people. The Khmer Rouges rei gn in Cambodia was a horrific time period for many Cambodians. Wikipedia Khmer Rouge pg7 Wikipedia Khmer Rouge pg7 Khmer Rouge Khmer Rouge pg4 Wikipedia Khmer Rouge pg8 Wikipedia Khmer Rouge pg9 Wikipedia Khmer Rouge pg9 Wikipedia Khmer Rouge pg9 Wikipedia Communism pg1 An independent Cambodia pg4

hannibal :: essays research papers

When Hannibal was nine he went with his father on the to conquer Spain. Before starting, the kid swore to hate Rome. In two years he conquered all Spain between the Tagus and Iberus rivers. The Romans branded this attack a violation of the existing treaty between Rome and Carthage and demanded that Carthage surrender Hannibal to them. On the refusal of the Carthaginians to do so, the Romans declared war on Carthage, so because of that they precipitated in the Second Punic War. The march on Rome began Hannibal left Spain with an army of about 40,000, including cavalry and a lot of elephants carrying baggage and later used in battle. He traversed the Alps in 15 days, beset by snowstorms, landslides, and the attacks of hostile mountain tribes. After recruiting additional men and invaded the Roman provinces. Then Rome sent to oppose Hannibal. Avoiding any decisive encounter with the Carthaginian troops, they nevertheless succeeded in keeping Hannibal at bay, and giving the Romans the op portunity to recover from their military reverses. Hannibal wintered at Gerontium, and then he took up a position at Cannae on the Aufidus River. There he almost completely annihilated a Roman army of more than 50,000 men. Carthaginian losses were about 6700 men. After the Battle of Cannae, the character of the war underwent a change. Hannibal needed reinforcements, which the Carthaginian government refused to give, and he also lacked weapons. He marched on Naples, but failed to take the city. The gates of Capua, one of the Italian cities that had fallen to Hannibal in consequence of his victory at Cannae, were opened to him. then Hannibal attempted to take Rome, but the Romans successfully maintained their fixed positions. The Romans then retook Capua. After four years of inconclusive fighting, Hannibal turned for aid to his brother Hasdrubal, who forthwith marched from Spain. Hasdrubal, however, was surprised, defeated, and slain by the Roman consul Gaius Claudius Nero in the Batt le of the Metauro River. After 15 years, and with Hannibal’s army getting smaller and smaller he was recalled to Africa to direct the defense of his country against a Roman invasion When he got there his raw troops fled, many deserting to the Romans, and his veterans were cut down.